NASCAR Champion Kyle Bush and Wife Allege $8.5M Loss in Life Insurance “Retirement” Trap

Posted: November 13, 2025

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In a case that has drawn wide attention in both the sports and financial sectors, Kyle Busch and his wife, Samantha Busch, have filed a lawsuit claiming they lost more than $8 million after purchasing what they believed were safe retirement vehicles through complex life-insurance contracts. InvestmentNews reported the couple now say those policies were misrepresented.

It’s a cautionary tale for everyday Americans.

Kyle Busch’s Indexed Universal Life (IUL) Policy

According to the couple’s complaint, they paid approximately $10.4 million in premiums over a relatively short period for a set of contracts marketed as “tax-free retirement plans.” Their net out-of-pocket losses are alleged to exceed $8.58 million.

Morningstar reports that the suit names Pacific Life Insurance Company and one of its agents, claiming the insurer and its affiliated agents:

  • Used misleading illustrations
  • Failed to disclose key charges; and
  • Promised performance that was unattainable.

The Busches say the policies were pitched as low-risk, self-funding retirement vehicles when in truth they were “financial traps.”

Kyle Busch said in a statement: “These policies were sold to us as part of a retirement plan — something safe and secure that would grow tax-free and protect our family long after racing. We trusted the people who sold them and the name Pacific Life. But the reality is far different.”

Samantha Busch added, “Now that we are going through this process, I am learning how completely misrepresented these products can be when they’re sold. It makes me worry about families, retirees, and anyone trying to plan responsibly for their future.”

How the Product Works and What Went Wrong

The type of policy at issue is known as an Indexed Universal Life (IUL) insurance policy. IULs are permanent life insurance contracts that combine a death-benefit component with a cash-value account whose growth is linked to the performance of a stock-market index such as the S&P 500.

While IULs often promise features like tax-deferred growth, flexible premium payments, and access to accumulated cash value, they also carry significant risks.

IULs frequently come with:

  • Caps and participation-rates that limit how much of the underlying index’s gains the policyholder receives.
  • High internal costs and increasing insurance charges that can erode or eliminate cash value over time.
  • Illustrations and sales materials that assume unrealistic rates of return, meaning the actual performance may diverge drastically.

In the Busch complaint, the couple allege that they were told after paying premiums for five years that they could withdraw roughly $800,000 annually beginning at age 52. They now say this promise was “a lie.”  When the sixth premium notice arrived, despite a plan described as a five-year payment schedule, they began to suspect something was awry. An independent review found the policy was projected to lapse in only 16 months.

As the Morningstar observed, “Misleading IUL policies drain savings from athletes, retirees, and working families alike.”

Why This Case Matters

This lawsuit spotlights several critical issues for consumers and the financial services industry:

  1. Marketing of “safe” investment vehicles
    According to Morningstar, the Busches say the life insurance policies were sold to them as safe, tax-free retirement plans. That kind of sales pitch can sound appealing to almost anyone, but the case shows how these products are often promoted with overly positive promises while hiding serious financial risks.
  2. Consumer vulnerability
    Kyle Busch may be a high-profile figure, but his case may mirror what many working Americans face. Teachers, small-business owners and retirees are among those commonly targeted with IUL products.
  3. Industry and regulatory scrutiny
    IULs are increasingly drawing scrutiny as people question how the sales illustrations are made and whether buyers really understand the risks, like losing coverage or earning less than expected. More regulators and consumers are now asking if these policies truly belong in a retirement plan.
  4. Legal accountability
    The Busches’ lawsuit claims that the defendants were careless, failed to act in their best interest, and used unfair or misleading business practices, all in violation of North Carolina law.

What Consumers Should Ask & Watch For

Given this case, anyone thinking about buying a similar indexed universal life insurance policy should take a close look at the details:

  • What assumptions are used in the policy’s illustration? Are the projected growth rates realistic?
  • What limits, participation rates, and fees apply, and how clearly are they explained?
  • What happens if the market performs poorly or costs go up? Could your premiums rise, or could the policy expire?
  • Was the policy sold to you as an investment or mainly as life insurance?
  • Are you getting advice from someone who must act in your best interest, or from an agent who earns a commission on the sale?

A securities and investment fraud lawyer can help investors if they feel their indexed universal life insurance policy caused them to suffer loss.

Key Takeaways From Kyle Busch’s Investment in IULs

IULs are complex, high-fee products. Many investors discover too late that their policy hasn’t grown as expected, and their so-called “safe investment” is far from safe.

Indexed universal life insurance policies, when misrepresented, can lead to substantial losses. Kyle and Samantha Busch’s lawsuit serves as a high-profile example of what can happen with these investments, even if you’re wealthy and famous.

SOURCES: